• My Account
    • Login
  • Contact Us

CodingIntel

Medical coding resources for physicians and their staff. CodingIntel was founded by consultant and coding expert Betsy Nicoletti.

  • Join Today
  • What is CodingIntel
    • About
    • Become a Member
    • FAQ
  • Pricing
  • Free Resources
    • Overview
    • Blog
    • Everyday Coding Q&A
    • Newsletter
    • Can I get paid
  • Coding Library
    • Coding Guides
    • Quick Reference Sheets
    • E/M Services
    • How Physician Services Are Paid
    • Prevention & Screening
    • Care Management & Remote Monitoring
    • Surgery, Modifiers & Global
    • Diagnosis Coding
    • New & Newsworthy
    • Speciality
    • Practice Management
    • E/M Rules Archive
  • Webinars

February 5, 2023

Why not bill all 99213 visits in an FQHC?

Why not bill all 99213 visits in an FQHC? (Hint: it’s a good way of telling everyone that they were pretty easy visits.)

Practitioners who work in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) can get in the habit of billing all level three office visits, understanding that an FQHC is paid under the Prospective Payment System (PPS rate)  for patients with Medicare and Medicaid. Whether the visit was a simple visit or the patient had a complex and time-consuming set of problems, the health center is paid the same rate for patients with Medicare and Medicaid.  FQHCs are paid based on the visit, not by the number or complexity of visits performed. For patients paid under the PPS rate, there are only two types of medical services paid at a higher rate: new patient visits and Medicare wellness visits. Those are paid at 134% of the PPS rate.

When a practitioner uses mostly 99213 visits, they are telling the administrator, their medical director, and the payer that the patient visits are pretty easy. They are communicating that the disease burden of their patients is simpler than seen in other primary care practices. Of course, diagnosis coding also tells the story to administration and to payers about acuity. But level of service is important as well.

E/M frequency data

New OV Family Medicine Internal Medicine   Established office visits Family Medicine Internal Medicine
99201 0.00% 0.00% 99211 2.40% 2.29%
99202 7.80% 4.39% 99212 2.19% 2.38%
99203 38.33% 24.57% 99213 33.33% 32.42%
99204 48.21% 55.73% 99214 58.05% 57.32%
99205 5.65% 15.32% 99215 4.03% 5.59%

Data above is from 2021, released in late 2022.

This CMS data from the entire country shows the level of service billed by internists and family physicians. It is not meant to be prescriptive, of course. But physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants can compare their own distribution of new and established patient visits with those billed by their peers across the country. If their distribution is significantly different than this norm, they can ask themselves why. Are my patients really simpler and easier to care for the other patients or am I selecting a level of service incorrectly? Or, conversely, if their distribution shows more high-level visits, ask the opposite question.

No one expects that all clinicians will have the same distribution of office visit codes. A clinician may mostly do walk-in or same day appointments, and have more lower-level office visits. A practitioner may see the more complex patients in the practice with multiple chronic conditions, see fewer patients in a day, but each is complex. Practices vary.

Selecting a level of service

Office visit codes are selected based on either time or medical decision making, beginning in 2021. Selecting all level three visits because it is the easiest and most familiar can incorrectly communicate the level of work that they are doing. It sends this message: “My patients are not very sick. ” “Today’s appointment schedule was a piece of cake.”

In addition, most FQHC’s have some patients with private insurance. Private insurance can amount to 10%, 20%, or even 30% of the population of patients. It wouldn’t be compliant, and it doesn’t make sense compliant to select the level of service based on the patient’s insurance. The reasonable course of action is to select the level of office visit based on either time or medical decision-making for all patients that are seen, as defined by CPT.  Moving from using essentially all 99213 visits to some 99213 and some 99214 visits can provide immediate revenue (resources) for the FQHC from commercial payers. FQHCs are required to have a sliding fee scale for self-pay patients, so accurate coding doesn’t penalize those patients.

There are resources on CodingIntel that can help practitioners select the accurate level of service using the new 2021 E/M guidelines, as well as information from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians. Not to mention the American Medical Association.

Selecting codes at the end of an encounter has two purposes (okay, three, if you can’t that it allows you to close the note and see the next patient). It gets the claim paid. And, it communicates to the payer the acuity of the patient and the panel of patients. Select the level of service with that in mind.

CodingIntel members: there are additional FQHC coding resources in the FQHC section of our specialty page.

Back to blog


Get more tips and coding insights from coding expert Betsy Nicoletti.

Subscribe and receive our FREE monthly newsletter and Everyday Coding Q&A.

Sign up

We will never share your email address. Unsubscribe anytime.

Last revised December 15, 2022 - Betsy Nicoletti
Tags: FQHC

CPT®️️ is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association. Copyright American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

2023 E/M reference sheets

These handy quick reference sheets included at-a-glance MDM requirements for office, hospital, nursing home and home and residence services. And, a bonus sheet with typical time for those code sets. Sign up for Betsy’s monthly newsletter to download these reference sheets and share them with your practitioners.

Sign Up Now

2023 E/M guidelines for hospital, nursing facility, home and residence services | Webinar

Effective January 1, 2023, the AMA has revised the definitions and guidelines for hospital and other E/M services, including ED visits, nursing facility services, home services, and domiciliary care codes. Also, coding for prolonged care services gets another overhaul with revised codes and guidelines. Watch this webinar about all these changes.

Watch it now

Latest Intel

Removal of sutures or staples

There are three codes for removal of sutures or … Read More...

Coding for Hernia Repair

CPT® revised the codes and concepts used for … Read More...

Coding Guide – Critical Care Services

Critical care is a complex service provided to a … Read More...

CMS Teaching Physician Rules Update | Webinar

Let's review the teaching physician … Read More...

Browse By Categories

Browse Content

  • Articles
  • Coding Guides
  • Everyday Coding Q&A
  • Videos
  • Can I Get Paid to
  • Blog
  • Webinars

Tags

behavioral health_cpt codes behavioral health_E/M services behavioral health_medication management care management CMS updates Code sets and reimbursement compliance issues CPT codes for preventive services CPT updates critical care services dermatology_essential resource dermatology_procedures E/M frequency data E/M medical decision making E/M overview E/M reference sheets FQHC general surgery_diagnosis coding general surgery_E/M services general surgery_modifiers general surgery_procedures global surgery issues HCC diagnosis coding ICD-10 coding level of service_history level of service_MDM level of service_time medicare incident-to and shared services minor procedures modifiers office and other E/M Preventive and problem visits preventive services for medicare primary care_diagnosis coding primary care_E/M services primary care_essential resource primary care_modifiers primary care_other E/M services primary care_preventive services primary care_procedures prolonged care remote physiologic monitoring screening and counseling for behavioral conditions teaching physician rules telehealth

All content on CodingIntel is copyright protected. Any resource shared within the permissions granted here may not be altered in any way, and should retain all copyright information and logos.

  • What is CodingIntel
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

Our mission is to provide up-to-date, simplified, citation driven resources that empower our members to gain confidence and authority in their coding role.

In 1988, CodingIntel.com founder Betsy Nicoletti started a Medical Services Organization for a rural hospital, supporting physician practice. She has been a self-employed consultant since 1998. She estimates that in the last 20 years her audience members number over 28,400 at in person events and webinars. She has had 2,500 meetings with clinical providers and reviewed over 43,000 medical notes. She knows what questions need answers and developed this resource to answer those questions. For more about Betsy visit www.betsynicoletti.com.

Copyright © 2023, CodingIntel
Privacy Policy