• My Account
    • Login
  • Contact Us

CodingIntel

Medical coding resources for physicians and their staff. CodingIntel was founded by consultant and coding expert Betsy Nicoletti.

  • Join Today
  • What is CodingIntel
    • About
    • Become a Member
    • FAQ
  • Pricing
  • Free Resources
    • Overview
    • Blog
    • Everyday Coding Q&A
    • Newsletter
    • Can I get paid
  • Coding Library
    • Coding Guides
    • Quick Reference Sheets
    • E/M Services
    • How Physician Services Are Paid
    • Prevention & Screening
    • Care Management & Remote Monitoring
    • Surgery, Modifiers & Global
    • Diagnosis Coding
    • New & Newsworthy
    • Speciality
    • Practice Management
    • E/M Rules Archive
  • Webinars

March 29, 2023

Insights: Changes in level of service using office visit guidelines

  • The American Medical Association (AMA) changed the definitions for codes 99202–99215, effective 1/1/2021
  • Medical practices are struggling to accurately apply these new definitions to office visits
  • There are significant shifts in the level of service calculated from 2020 to 2021

Both the AMA and CMS said that they didn’t anticipate that levels of service would change with the implementation of new guidelines.  It seemed likely to me – and others – that the levels would change. And based on conversations I’m having with practices, it seems that they are.

Looking for how to interpret data or using time? Watch our FAQ videos on data and time.

Changes for new patient encounters

At first glance, it seems that achieving higher levels of new patient visits would be the result of removing the requirements for history and exam in selecting a level of service. And it’s true, that no one will ever go to a clinician again and say “If only you had one more system in the review systems then this visit would’ve been a level four.” Or, “Only the billing provider can document the history of the present illness.”

But there are two things missing from the new guidelines that will have the effect of lowering the level of new patient visits. The first is that the concept of new to the examiner is removed from the guidelines and the second is that new to the examiner with workout planned. In the 1995 and 1997 guidelines, these two issues often moved the number of problems to moderate or high.

Now, using the new guidelines and the first element, the number and complexity of problems addressed, both of those are gone. Problems relate to the patient, not the examiner. New or existing is removed. And, work up is accounted for in data. Using this first element, some problems that were “new to the examiner,” i.e., moderate, are now “acute, uncomplicated illnesses,” i.e., low in this first element.

Changes in visit level for common scenarios

Using the 1995/1997, required two of three or three of three of the key components of history, exam and MDM. The scenarios below assume that the level of history and exam required for 1995/1997 visits in 2020 are met. They describe MDM only.

As you review these examples, you’ll see that some visits code at a higher level now, and some at a lower level. 

Sample visits

  • Visit #1 – Acute problem with prescription drug management: ASSUME history and exam meet requirements: of course, most kids with otitis wouldn’t have a comprehensive history/exam. This is showing how MDM works.

4 year-old brought in by her Dad. Dad reports child complains her ear hurts, she has a fever and she is up at night crying. Physician diagnoses otitis media, gives antibiotics.

Using the 1995/1997 guidelines, the complaint was new to the examiner.

Using the 2021 guidelines, the problem relates to the patient, and is an acute, uncomplicated illness.

 

  • Visit #2 – One problem, not in good control

Patient with ADHD presents for follow up and prescription renewal. Reports symptoms are not well -controlled. Difficulty concentrating and with task completion. Assessment:  ADHD not at goal. Prefers to continue same dose of medication, but gave him a referral for therapy.”

Using the 1995/1997 guidelines, one established problem (to the examiner) not stable was low complexity.

Using the 2021 guidelines, one chronic problem not at goal is moderate under the number and complexity of problems addressed.

 

  • Visit #3 – One problem, seen by specialist, stable chronic condition

Patient with lupus seen for six month visit by rheumatologist. Labs were ordered at prior visit, and are reviewed at this visit. Patient’s symptoms under good control, at goal. Medications renewed.

Using the 1995/1997 guidelines, one established problem in good control was minimal in the column for number of problems. One or ten lab tests was one point for lab.

Using the 2021 guidelines, one chronic problem, stable, is low complexity for problems. Because the doctor ordered the labs at a prior visit, no credit is given for reviewing them at this visit.

  • Visit #4 – Two stable problems

Patient with hyperlipidemia and hypertension. Both are at goal for patient. Nurse practitioner reviews two labs, ordered over the phone the prior week. Renews medications.

Using the 1995/1997 guidelines, two stable problems was limited in the number of diagnoses/management options, one point each. Two labs counts a one point for lab.

In 2021, two stable chronic problems are moderate in the number and complexity of problems addressed.

Additional Resources

  • See our E/M changes for 2021 roadmap for a complete list of resources on this topic.

Back to blog


Get more tips and coding insights from coding expert Betsy Nicoletti.

Subscribe and receive our FREE monthly newsletter and Everyday Coding Q&A.

Sign up

We will never share your email address. Unsubscribe anytime.

Last revised January 24, 2023 - Betsy Nicoletti
Tags: E/M overview

CPT®️️ is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association. Copyright American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

2023 E/M reference sheets

These handy quick reference sheets included at-a-glance MDM requirements for office, hospital, nursing home and home and residence services. And, a bonus sheet with typical time for those code sets. Sign up for Betsy’s monthly newsletter to download these reference sheets and share them with your practitioners.

Sign Up Now

2023 E/M guidelines for hospital, nursing facility, home and residence services | Webinar

Effective January 1, 2023, the AMA has revised the definitions and guidelines for hospital and other E/M services, including ED visits, nursing facility services, home services, and domiciliary care codes. Also, coding for prolonged care services gets another overhaul with revised codes and guidelines. Watch this webinar about all these changes.

Watch it now

Latest Intel

Coding for hospital services | Webinar

Coding for hospital services April 20, 2023 … Read More...

CMS Split/Shared Services Rules | Reference Sheet

Download Reference Sheet Split/shared services … Read More...

Chronic Care Management | Reference Sheet

This quick reference sheet includes clinical staff … Read More...

Screening and Behavioral Counseling Interventions in Primary Care to Reduce Alcohol Misuse | HCPCS Code G0442

The  US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) … Read More...

Browse By Categories

Browse Content

  • Articles
  • Coding Guides
  • Everyday Coding Q&A
  • Videos
  • Can I Get Paid to
  • Blog
  • Webinars

Tags

behavioral health_cpt codes behavioral health_E/M services care management CMS updates Code sets and reimbursement compliance issues CPT codes for preventive services CPT updates critical care services dermatology_essential resource dermatology_procedures E/M frequency data E/M medical decision making E/M overview E/M reference sheets FQHC general surgery_diagnosis coding general surgery_E/M services general surgery_modifiers general surgery_procedures global surgery issues HCC diagnosis coding hospital inpatient/observation ICD-10 coding level of service_history level of service_MDM level of service_time medicare incident-to and shared services minor procedures modifiers newborn care office and other E/M Preventive and problem visits preventive services for medicare primary care_diagnosis coding primary care_E/M services primary care_essential resource primary care_modifiers primary care_other E/M services primary care_preventive services primary care_procedures remote physiologic monitoring screening and counseling for behavioral conditions teaching physician rules telehealth

All content on CodingIntel is copyright protected. Any resource shared within the permissions granted here may not be altered in any way, and should retain all copyright information and logos.

  • What is CodingIntel
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

Our mission is to provide up-to-date, simplified, citation driven resources that empower our members to gain confidence and authority in their coding role.

In 1988, CodingIntel.com founder Betsy Nicoletti started a Medical Services Organization for a rural hospital, supporting physician practice. She has been a self-employed consultant since 1998. She estimates that in the last 20 years her audience members number over 28,400 at in person events and webinars. She has had 2,500 meetings with clinical providers and reviewed over 43,000 medical notes. She knows what questions need answers and developed this resource to answer those questions. For more about Betsy visit www.betsynicoletti.com.

Copyright © 2023, CodingIntel
Privacy Policy