CodingIntel
  • What is CodingIntel
    • About
    • Become a Member
    • FAQ
  • Pricing
  • Free Resources
    • Overview
    • Free Articles
    • Everyday Coding Q&A
    • Newsletter
    • Can I get paid
    • Consultant Database
  • Coding Library
    • Coding Guides
    • Quick Reference Sheets
    • E/M Services
    • How Physician Services Are Paid
    • Prevention & Screening
    • Care Management & Remote Monitoring
    • Surgery, Modifiers & Global
    • Diagnosis Coding
    • New & Newsworthy
    • Speciality
    • Practice Management
    • E/M Rules Archive
    • Courses
  • Webinars
Contact us
Sign in Join

March 8, 2026

Time Statements for E/M Visits: What Coders and Providers Need to Know

Nicoletti Notes January 2026
Published on January 13th, 2026

Time-based coding for Evaluation and Management (E/M) services can be a powerful tool, but only when used correctly. Incomplete or vague documentation of time can lead to denials, audits, and compliance issues. Here’s a breakdown of the best and worst practices when documenting time for E/M visits.

Stay current. Code Confidently

Join over 2,500 members who trust our citation-based resources.

Join Today

Time Statements: What to Avoid

Too Short: “Time Spent” with No Details
Simply stating “30 minutes spent with patient” isn’t enough. Without a description of the work performed, it’s most certainly impossible to justify the level of service.

Why It Fails: Payers need to see what was done during the time stated (e.g., history review, time with the patient, counseling, coordination of care after the visit, documentation, etc).

Too Vague: Greater Than or Less Than
Statements like “>30 minutes” or “less than 15 minutes” are ambiguous and lack clarity.
These phrases don’t align with CPT® guidelines, and they do not support precise code selection.

Why It Fails: Coding requires specific time ranges and vague estimates do not meet CPT® documentation standards.  Internal and external auditors won’t credit these.

Teaching Physician Time Not Clearly Documented
When residents or fellows are involved in direct patient care, the attending physician’s time spent in direct patient care versus time spent in teaching the resident or fellow must be clearly documented. Statements like “I personally spent 40 minutes outside of teaching time with the patient discussing treatment, reviewing records, and documenting in the chart”, make it clear that only direct patient care time was used in calculating the level of service.

Why It Fails: Only the time the teaching physician spends outside of teaching activities counts toward E/M coding. CMS requires clear delineation, and most major commercial carriers follow CMS guidelines as well.

Best Time Statements: What to Include

Specific Time + Description of Activities
“I spent a total of 35 minutes discussing the patient’s new diagnosis of diabetes, medication options, and lifestyle changes.”

Clear Separation of Teaching Time
“Total time spent: 40 minutes. Of this, 25 minutes were direct patient care by the attending physician, excluding time spent teaching the resident.”

Time Range Matching CPT® Guidelines
“Total time: 60 minutes, used for reviewing labs, discussing treatment options, and coordinating care with the patient’s cardiologist.”

Specific time documentation supports accurate coding, protects against potential paybacks, and ensures fair reimbursement. A great rule of thumb is to be specific, clear, and always tie documentation of time back to the work performed.

Last revised February 16, 2026 - CodingIntel Editor

CPT®️️ is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association. Copyright American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

CODE CONFIDENTLY

Join over 2,500 members who trust our citation-based resources.

Become a Member

Stay Current

Depression Coding and Hierarchical Condition Coding (HCC)

HCC Coding for Medical Practices | Webinar

CPT® 99459 Guidelines

Avoid These Coding Mistakes: A Guide for Accuracy and Compliance

Browse By Categories

Browse Content

  • Articles
  • Coding Guides
  • Everyday Coding Q&A
  • Videos
  • Can I Get Paid to
  • NicolettiNotes
  • Webinars

All content on CodingIntel is copyright protected. Any resource shared within the permissions granted here may not be altered in any way, and should retain all copyright information and logos.

  • About CodingIntel
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

Our mission is to provide up-to-date, simplified, citation driven resources that empower our members to gain confidence and authority in their coding role.

In 1988, CodingIntel.com founder Betsy Nicoletti started a Medical Services Organization for a rural hospital, supporting physician practice. She has been a self-employed consultant since 1998. She estimates that in the last 20 years her audience members number over 28,400 at in person events and webinars. She has had 2,500 meetings with clinical providers and reviewed over 43,000 medical notes. She knows what questions need answers and developed this resource to answer those questions.

Copyright © 2026, CodingIntel
A division of Medical Practice Consulting, LLC
Privacy Policy