• My Account
    • Login
  • Contact Us

CodingIntel

Medical coding resources for physicians and their staff. CodingIntel was founded by consultant and coding expert Betsy Nicoletti.

  • Join Today
  • What is CodingIntel
    • About
    • Become a Member
    • FAQ
  • Pricing
  • Free Resources
    • Overview
    • Blog
    • Everyday Coding Q&A
    • Newsletter
    • Can I get paid
  • Coding Library
    • Coding Guides
    • Quick Reference Sheets
    • E/M Services
    • How Physician Services Are Paid
    • Prevention & Screening
    • Care Management & Remote Monitoring
    • Surgery, Modifiers & Global
    • Diagnosis Coding
    • New & Newsworthy
    • Speciality
    • Practice Management
    • E/M Rules Archive
  • Webinars

June 8, 2023

Describe the exam | E/M services for dermatology

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

ARCHIVE

The 1995/1997 Documentation Guidelines are gone beginning 1-1-2023. (Ding dong….) However we will still need to use them when auditing notes from before 2023. 

This article does not apply to services performed after 1-1-2023.

What do you need to document for the exam?

Although exam is not a key component in 2021 for codes 99202–99215, it is still a good idea to describe the exam elements.

According to the Documentation Guidelines, exam findings must be documented. It is not sufficient to list the areas documented and then describe only abnormal findings.  From the Guidelines:

DG: Specific abnormal and relevant negative findings of the examination of the affected or symptomatic body area(s) or organ system(s) should be documented. A notation of “abnormal” without elaboration is insufficient.

DG: Abnormal or unexpected findings of the examination of the unaffected or asymptomatic body area(s) or organ system(s) should be described.

DG: A brief statement or notation indicating “negative” or “normal” is sufficient to document normal findings related to unaffected area(s) or asymptomatic organ system(s)

What does this mean in dermatology notes documented using an electronic medical record?

It is insufficient to simply list the exam areas examined. There must be a notation that those exam areas were normal.

“Relevant negative findings of the affected or symptomatic body area(s) or organ system(s) should be documented.”

Look at your template.  Does it simply list the body areas examined or does it specifically say that they were normal, except as described in the next section.

  • List what was examined. “Examinations below found to be normal (except as noted on exam),” doesn’t get credit unless the body areas are listed.
  • Here is an example of a template that works: “An examination was performed including the scalp (including hair inspection), head, (including face), lips, neck, chest, abdomen, back, RUE, LUE, RLE, LLE, breasts, buttocks (not genitalia) and inspection and palpation of digits and nails. Findings in the above exam areas were normal with the exception of…
  • Here is an example that doesn’t work: “Patient had a full body exam except genitalia, which included abdomen, back, buttocks, chest, breast and axilla, head, face, RUE, LUE, RLE, LLE.”  There is no statement that the exam was normal. There is a description of abnormalities in the procedure note.
Document normal findings as normal, describe abnormal findings!

 

Last revised February 2, 2023 - Betsy Nicoletti
Tags: level of service_Exam

CPT®️️ is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association. Copyright American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Audit tool for Modifier 25

Reasonable coders and practitioners can and do disagree about when a separate E/M service is warranted on the day of a minor procedure. This audit tool for modifier 25 will help determine if a separate E/M service should be reported. Using it consistently will help practices be reliable in their determinations and provide support in payer audits. Sign up for our monthly newsletter to download the reference sheet.

Sign Up Now

2023 E/M guidelines for hospital, nursing facility, home and residence services | Webinar

Effective January 1, 2023, the AMA has revised the definitions and guidelines for hospital and other E/M services, including ED visits, nursing facility services, home services, and domiciliary care codes. Also, coding for prolonged care services gets another overhaul with revised codes and guidelines. Watch this webinar about all these changes.

Watch it now

Latest Intel

HCC coding: V24 versus V28

Medical practices are assessing the impact of the … Read More...

Reporting the Global Surgical Package | Webinar

Your Guide to Accurately Reporting the Global … Read More...

Coding for telehealth

Updated (again) May 17, 2023.  Will there be more … Read More...

Compliance issues in ICD-10 coding for risk based contracts and HCCs

Everyone loves to read the general guidelines at … Read More...

Browse By Categories

Browse Content

  • Articles
  • Coding Guides
  • Everyday Coding Q&A
  • Videos
  • Can I Get Paid to
  • Blog
  • Webinars

Tags

behavioral health_cpt codes behavioral health_E/M services care management CMS updates Code sets and reimbursement compliance issues CPT codes for preventive services CPT updates critical care services dermatology_essential resource dermatology_procedures E/M frequency data E/M medical decision making E/M overview E/M reference sheets FQHC general surgery_diagnosis coding general surgery_E/M services general surgery_modifiers general surgery_procedures global surgery issues HCC diagnosis coding hospital inpatient/observation ICD-10 coding level of service_history level of service_MDM level of service_time medicare incident-to and shared services minor procedures modifiers newborn care Preventive and problem visits preventive services for medicare primary care_diagnosis coding primary care_E/M services primary care_essential resource primary care_modifiers primary care_other E/M services primary care_preventive services primary care_procedures prolonged care remote physiologic monitoring screening and counseling for behavioral conditions teaching physician rules telehealth

All content on CodingIntel is copyright protected. Any resource shared within the permissions granted here may not be altered in any way, and should retain all copyright information and logos.

  • What is CodingIntel
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

Our mission is to provide up-to-date, simplified, citation driven resources that empower our members to gain confidence and authority in their coding role.

In 1988, CodingIntel.com founder Betsy Nicoletti started a Medical Services Organization for a rural hospital, supporting physician practice. She has been a self-employed consultant since 1998. She estimates that in the last 20 years her audience members number over 28,400 at in person events and webinars. She has had 2,500 meetings with clinical providers and reviewed over 43,000 medical notes. She knows what questions need answers and developed this resource to answer those questions. For more about Betsy visit www.betsynicoletti.com.

Copyright © 2023, CodingIntel
Privacy Policy