• My Account
    • Login
  • Contact Us

CodingIntel

Medical coding resources for physicians and their staff. CodingIntel was founded by consultant and coding expert Betsy Nicoletti.

  • Join Today
  • What is CodingIntel
    • About
    • Become a Member
    • FAQ
  • Pricing
  • Free Resources
    • Overview
    • Blog
    • Everyday Coding Q&A
    • Newsletter
    • Can I get paid
  • Coding Library
    • Coding Guides
    • Quick Reference Sheets
    • E/M Services
    • How Physician Services Are Paid
    • Prevention & Screening
    • Care Management & Remote Monitoring
    • Surgery, Modifiers & Global
    • Diagnosis Coding
    • New & Newsworthy
    • Speciality
    • Practice Management
    • E/M Rules Archive
  • Webinars

February 5, 2023

FAQ: Scoring elements in the E/M guidelines

Scoring MDM elements can be challenging for E/M services

This post includes questions related to:

  • Major/Minor procedure
  • Data Elements (with link to additional resources)
  • General questions about the guidelines
  • Using time (with link to additional resources)
  • Social determinants of health

Want unlimited access to CodingIntel's online library?

Including updates on CPT® and CMS coding changes for 2023

Join Today

Major or minor procedure?

Question: I have a question about how to determine if a procedure is a major or minor procedure when assessing risk in the new E/M guidelines for office visits. I heard from a colleague that the AMA is saying it is the surgeon’s judgment and not the global days that determines if the procedure is major or minor.  Is that right?

Answer: Yes.  Solely for the purpose of determining the level of risk using the new office visit guidelines, the AMA said at a symposium not to use global days to determine if a procedure is a minor procedure or a major procedure. Using global days would mean heart catheter, endoscopy, and some spinal procedures would be minor procedures! This language is confirmed in writing in the 2022 CPT book.

The new guidelines now read “decision regarding minor surgery with identified patient or procedure risk factors,” “decision regarding major surgery with patient or procedure risk factors,” and “decision regarding minor surgery with patient or procedure risk factors.” I recommend that the physician document risk factors that are inherent to the procedure (bleeding, puncturing the lung, paralysis) and risk factors related to co-morbidities and conditions of the patient.

Where the procedure is done and the type of anesthesia may also factor into this determination. Skin procedures that can be done in the office with lidocaine would be more likely to be minor procedures than procedures done in the operating room under general anesthesia. Treating a non-displaced fracture without manipulation has fewer procedure-inherent risks than taking a patient to the operating room to reduce an open fracture.

Data Elements

For additional information about data elements, read The second element of MDM in 2021: data. It includes a brief video summary and downloadable quick reference sheet “Credit for Tests in Data Element”.

Question: If I order an MRI at a visit on Sept. 20, and review it with the patient at a follow up visit on Sept 27, do I count the order on the 20th and the review on the 27th? I didn’t bill for the MRI or the interpretation.

Answer: No, count it once, at the order.  CPT says,

“Ordering a test is included in the category of test result(s) and the review of the test result is part of the encounter and not a subsequent encounter.”

And, from the CPT Assistant, (AMA publication) November, 2020, page 5: “It is assumed that the physician or other QHP would review the results of the test ordered; therefore, the physician or other QHP would not receive dual credit toward MDM for service-level selection for both ordering and reviewing the test.”

The AMA is consistent in this instruction. If you order a diagnostic test, say a CBC at a patient visit, reviewing the results that day, or, a day later, or at the subsequent visit, it is part of the order. When the patient returns to the office two weeks later, you do not get credit for reviewing the CBC results that you ordered. Count the data for the test once, at the encounter when it was ordered.

Question: In a cardiology practice, what if my cardiology partner did the official echo report and billed for it, but then I see a patient and view the echo. Can I count that as an independent interpretation?

Answer: No. If your same specialty partner, in your practice reported the professional component, do not credit an independent interpretation when you see the patient. While I don’t have an AMA citation for this, the new guidelines distinguish between reviewing notes from a same specialty partner and someone of a different specialty. I believe the concept is the same.

Question: What about lab results. I was away on vacation and my partner saw one of my patients and ordered labs. I saw the patient the next week and reviewed the results. Can I credit the review?

Answer: If you are in the same specialty, you are considered a single physician. This is confirmed in the CPT Assistant FAQ.

Question: If I order and bill for a quick strep test in my office, do I count the order, the review or both?

Answer: You can credit the order.  The AMA document with technical corrections now allows a group to credit the order of a test, even if billing for it. The sentence in the technical corrections is difficult to interpret, and would have benefited from being broken up into two sentences.  It says you may not credit ordering a test if you are reporting the professional interpretation of the test.  The AMA webinar was clear that since lab tests done in the office have results that are reviewed and not a formal professional interpretation, the order for those tests may be credited even if the practice is billing for it.

Question: Do you have any clarification regarding lab tests that are ordered and run in-house?  Can these be included as part of MDM.

Answer: Yes, the AMA’s 3/9/2021 document and the 5/27/2021 AMA webinar confirms that you are allowed Category 1 credit if you order the test and bill for it.

The document still says that you don’t double count the order and the review of the same test. If you order a CBC that is sent out, the order is considered part of the review.  This is from the CPT Assistant, November 2020 in the FAQ section, page 5, published by the AMA.

It is assumed that the physician or other QHP would review the results of the test ordered; therefore, the physician or other QHP would not receive dual credit toward MDM for service-level selection for both ordering and reviewing the test. Ordering and reviewing a test are considered a single component for MDM on the date of the encounter, even if ordering the test and subsequent review are performed on different days.

Question: Does a parent count as an independent historian? If so, up to what age child?

Answer: A parent does count as an independent historian. But, the clinician must need to obtain the history because the patient is unable to provide a complete and reliable history “eg, due to developmental stage, dementia, or psychosis) or because a confirmatory history is judged to be necessary.”

Question: A patient returns to our office, and the physician reviews the x-ray films done by us two years ago. She doesn’t just look at the report, she reviews the films. We billed for the professional interpretation two years ago.

Answer: The physician may not get credit for an independent interpretation. The guidelines are very clear that if the physician is billing for the interpretation or previously billed for the interpretation, it isn’t credited as an independent interpretation.  Don’t believe me? Here is what CPT says, with my emphasis.

“Independent Interpretation: The interpretation of a test for which there is a CPT code and an interpretation or report is customary. This does not apply when the physician or other qualified health care professional is reporting the service or has previously reported the service for the patient. A form of interpretation should be documented, but need not conform to the usual standards of a complete report for the test.”

Question: How would you credit this data? A 3-year-old patient and her dad come into the Pediatrician’s office, in follow up to an Urgent Care Center (UCC) visit over the weekend. The Pediatrician notes that he read the physician assistant’s note from the UCC, reviewed the a lab test result done at the UCC, and obtains history from the dad.

Answer: Moderate data. For moderate data, one of three categories must be met. Category 1 is tests, documents, or independent historian(s). Three are required for moderate data. This note has review of an external note, review of the results of a unique test and an independent historian.

Question: A patient returns to our Endocrinology office, and lab tests are imported from the prior years. There are three years worth of liver function tests and A1c results. Do we count each one?

Answer: No. Count the lab results (if not ordered at a prior encounter or separately reported) the first time they are reviewed and analyzed, only once.  The AMA 3/9/2021 document stated this explicitly.  Also, the 3/9 document said that if you review multiple lab results for the same test (three separate a1c results, for example) count it once. This was confirmed during the 5/25/2021 webinar.

Comment: In primary care, a provider orders labs and patient has f/u to give results. We can credit the order at the visit that they were ordered and not on the f/u to give results…?

Response: Exactly. Page 14 of CPT 2022 says “Therefore, when tests are ordered during an encounter, they are counted in that encounter.” That is, don’t credit reviewing the test result at a subsequent encounter.

General questions about the guidelines

Question: What if a patient presents with an undiagnosed new problem, and two chronic illnesses with exacerbation. Does that move element one, number and complexity of problems, from moderate to high?

Answer: No. You don’t sum up the number of problems. Follow the examples in the tables. The AMA has confirmed that having multiple problems in one “box” does not move the visit to the next box.

Question: Many patients have problems that pose a threat to life or bodily function at some point in time. Is there any framework for time?

Answer: Yes. The guidelines say “in the near term without treatment.” In the first element, the number and complexity of problems addressed there is “acute or chronic illness or injury that poses a threat to life or bodily function.” The definition of that in the guidelines adds detail. “…that poses a threat to life or bodily function in the near term without treatment.” However, in a CPT Assistant FAQ, it stated that there is no CPT definition for near term.

Question: Can you give me an example of Social Determinants of Health?

Answer: Homelessness, food insecurity, lack of access to clean water, unable to afford medications.

Using time

For additional information about using time, read Time: Using time for office visits It includes a brief video summary and downloadable companion slides.

Question: If using time to select a code, should I document a time range or actual time?

Answer: Document actual time, and the activities you performed.

Question: If using time, do I need to list all of the activities and the time spent doing each one?

Answer: List total time and describe what activities were done. “I spent 45 minutes caring for this patient today, reviewing labs, records from another facility, seeing the patient, documenting in the record and arranging for a sleep study.”

Question: If using time to select a code, and the clinician reviews the record the day before, or completes the note the day after, can I count that time?

Answer: No, only time on the calendar day of the visit may be counted.

Question:  Can we use resident time in selecting E/M codes now with these new guideline?

    Answer: No.  Nothing about the new guidelines changes anything related to the teaching physician rules.

Social Determinants of Health

Question:

I see that the new E/M guidelines for codes 99202—99215 include social determinants of health, as moderate complexity. What is a social determinant of health? Does it include smoking and alcohol use?

Answer:

According to the CDC, social determinants of health “encompasses economic and social conditions that influence the health of people and communities.” It typically includes homelessness, food insecurity, unsafe living conditions (access to clean water, pollution free air), and economic insecurity. One specific example is not having the money to afford medications. It does not include smoking or alcohol use.

I wrote an article for Medscape about coding for these conditions, that you can read here.

The ICD-10 codes are in the last chapter of the code set, and includes categories Z55-Z65: “persons with potential health hazards related to socioeconomic and psychosocial circumstances.” These codes don’t bring increased reimbursement on a claims basis, unfortunately. But they provide information to health plans and Accountable Care Organizations about the factors that affect patient health and outcomes. Health systems may want to track this data, too, as they consider costs and quality, as well as outcomes.


 

Back to Everyday Coding Q&A

Want unlimited access to CodingIntel's online library?

Including updates on CPT® and CMS coding changes for 2023

Join Today

Last revised January 10, 2023 - Betsy Nicoletti
Tags: E/M overview

CPT®️️ is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association. Copyright American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

2023 E/M reference sheets

These handy quick reference sheets included at-a-glance MDM requirements for office, hospital, nursing home and home and residence services. And, a bonus sheet with typical time for those code sets. Sign up for Betsy’s monthly newsletter to download these reference sheets and share them with your practitioners.

Sign Up Now

2023 E/M guidelines for hospital, nursing facility, home and residence services | Webinar

Effective January 1, 2023, the AMA has revised the definitions and guidelines for hospital and other E/M services, including ED visits, nursing facility services, home services, and domiciliary care codes. Also, coding for prolonged care services gets another overhaul with revised codes and guidelines. Watch this webinar about all these changes.

Watch it now

Latest Intel

Removal of sutures or staples

There are three codes for removal of sutures or … Read More...

Coding for Hernia Repair

CPT® revised the codes and concepts used for … Read More...

Coding Guide – Critical Care Services

Critical care is a complex service provided to a … Read More...

CMS Teaching Physician Rules Update | Webinar

Let's review the teaching physician … Read More...

Browse By Categories

Browse Content

  • Articles
  • Coding Guides
  • Everyday Coding Q&A
  • Videos
  • Can I Get Paid to
  • Blog
  • Webinars

Tags

behavioral health_cpt codes behavioral health_E/M services behavioral health_medication management care management CMS updates Code sets and reimbursement compliance issues CPT codes for preventive services CPT updates critical care services dermatology_essential resource dermatology_procedures E/M frequency data E/M medical decision making E/M overview E/M reference sheets FQHC general surgery_diagnosis coding general surgery_E/M services general surgery_modifiers general surgery_procedures global surgery issues HCC diagnosis coding ICD-10 coding level of service_history level of service_MDM level of service_time medicare incident-to and shared services minor procedures modifiers office and other E/M Preventive and problem visits preventive services for medicare primary care_diagnosis coding primary care_E/M services primary care_essential resource primary care_modifiers primary care_other E/M services primary care_preventive services primary care_procedures prolonged care remote physiologic monitoring screening and counseling for behavioral conditions teaching physician rules telehealth

All content on CodingIntel is copyright protected. Any resource shared within the permissions granted here may not be altered in any way, and should retain all copyright information and logos.

  • What is CodingIntel
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

Our mission is to provide up-to-date, simplified, citation driven resources that empower our members to gain confidence and authority in their coding role.

In 1988, CodingIntel.com founder Betsy Nicoletti started a Medical Services Organization for a rural hospital, supporting physician practice. She has been a self-employed consultant since 1998. She estimates that in the last 20 years her audience members number over 28,400 at in person events and webinars. She has had 2,500 meetings with clinical providers and reviewed over 43,000 medical notes. She knows what questions need answers and developed this resource to answer those questions. For more about Betsy visit www.betsynicoletti.com.

Copyright © 2023, CodingIntel
Privacy Policy